beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.10.14 2016고단3457

공무집행방해등

Text

1. Defendant A and B shall be punished by a fine of 4,00,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won, respectively.

2. The defendants are above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 14, 2016, Defendant A violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. (joint assault) of the Defendants: (a) around 23:10 on May 14, 2016, she was under the influence of alcohol on the roads front of the E convenience point in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju; (b) she saw F to listen to music by a Handphone; and (c) her sound from the side to escape F, etc. with a convenience store; and (d) her hand was frighted by the victim G (ma, 51 years of age) on the ground that F, etc. was prevented.

The defendant B, by misunderstanding that the defendant A and the victim were sweled, she sweld with the victim's clothes in hand, and the defendant C also flicked with it, and she flicked the victim's flick and pushed down the chest.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

2. Defendant C’s property damage: (a) reported at the date, time, and place specified in the foregoing paragraph 1, that the victim H (ma, 27 years old) stops IK5 automobiles; and (b) destroyed the front part of the said car by walking up twice without any reason, to KRW 453,700 for the repair cost.

3. Defendant A and B rejected the defect that Defendant A and B were fighting at the same place outside of convenience stores at around 23:20 on the same day, Defendant A and B refused to arrest the Defendants as a flagrant offender and to take the back seat of the patrol police station, and Defendant B, both hand, carried the ice of the K security guards at several times, pushed down, pushed down, cut down, cut down, cut down, and pushed the chest part of the chest at one hand, and assaulted the chest part of the chest by other hand.

As a result, Defendant A and B interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement by the police of K on the obstruction of performance of official duties;

1. Each statement of G, H, F, and M 1.