A. As to KRW 300,265,988 and KRW 100,00,000 out of the amounts:

B. Defendant B.

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Applicable provisions of Acts: Judgment by deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. The grounds for the claim against Defendant B, Defendant C, and the appointed parties, and the facts as stated in the changed claims do not conflict between the parties, and the Plaintiff is jointly and severally liable to pay damages for delay calculated annually from October 16, 1999 to October 8, 2003 to 128,685,423 out of the amount described in the above paragraph (1) and 42,857,142 out of the amount mentioned in the above paragraph (1) within the scope of the property inherited from the network D, Defendant C, and the appointed parties C jointly and severally with tending belts to the extent of the property inherited from each network D. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 18578, Oct. 16, 1999; Presidential Decree No. 18173, Oct. 9, 2003; Presidential Decree No. 18170, Oct. 9, 2003>

3. According to the conclusion, each of the claims of this case against the Defendants by the Plaintiff is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.