beta
(영문) 부산고등법원(창원) 2019.09.26 2019나10012

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation as to this case is that the part concerning the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the judgment of paragraph (2) to the allegations emphasized by the plaintiff in this court. Thus, the court’s explanation as to this case

(2) Article 3(2) of the Addenda of the Trucking Transport Business Act (amended by Act No. 7100, Jan. 20, 2004; Act No. 7189, Dec. 31, 2004; Act No. 7189, Jan. 20, 2004; Act No. 7189, Jan. 20, 2004>

Pursuant to Article 3 (2) of the Addenda to the Trucking Transport Business Act (Act No. 11064, Sep. 16, 2011), a person who intends to operate a trucking transport business under a title trust or an entrustment contract with a person who runs a trucking transport business as of January 20, 204, among those who are entrusted with the trucking transport business by a truck under a title trust with a person who runs a trucking transport business as of January 20, 204, may file an application for permission with the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, notwithstanding Article 3 (5) 1, and the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs who receives an application for permission.