2. The Defendants recognized all of the facts charged of this case, and against the Defendants, there are favorable circumstances to the Defendants, such as the fact that the Defendants did not have any criminal record more than the fine, Defendant D did not have to have the primary criminal records, and that the Defendants were expected to have much profits from the crime of this case. Meanwhile, the crime of this case is a crime of taking property or property benefits by acquiring information on an unspecified number of credit cards, etc. by sharing their organizational roles, forging a forged credit card, using a forged credit card, and then forging it, which is highly harmful to the society. In light of the Defendants’ method, frequency, period, period, total amount of damage, etc., the crime of this case was very bad, and Defendant A was also a person who first planned and led the crime of this case and contributed directly to the execution of the crime of this case, and Defendant D also contributed directly to the execution of the crime of this case, and thus, it was almost inevitable for the Defendants to recover damage to the victims, and there was no special change in circumstances to change the punishment after the court below sentenced to the judgment below.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.