[criminal power] On February 21, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court on March 1, 2019, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 1, 2019. ② On May 30, 2019, the Defendant appealed one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, and is still pending in the appellate court. ③ On June 14, 2019, the Daegu District Court sentenced 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor, six months of imprisonment with prison labor, and fine of two hundred thousand won, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 22, 2019.

"2019 Highest 701"

1. On March 8, 2019, around 14:22, the Defendant: (a) was on the street in front of the AE Bank located in the North-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Daegu-gu, and (b) despite having no intent or ability to pay a taxi fee, the Defendant, despite having no intent or ability to pay a taxi fee, deceiving the victim as if he would normally pay a taxi fee to the AG taxi operated by the victim AF; (b) had the victim drive the taxi on the north-gu, North-gu, and the front of the post office; and (c) did not have the victim pay a taxi fee of KRW 10,000 to the victim.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

2. On March 10, 2019, around 01:00, the Defendant: (a) boarded a taxi operated by the victim AH on the water surface in the Daegu Metropolitan City; (b) moved to Daejeon; (c) around the time when the Dogcheon IC went into operation, the Defendant demanded the victim to “neeping in the vicinity”; (d) the victim went to take approximately KRW 30,000 in cash located in the seat of the cab at the seat of the cab; and (c) the victim went to take up KRW 30,000 in cash located in the seat of the cab.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

"2019 Highest821"

3. On March 31, 2019, the Defendant: (a) was on the street near the 27 sloping bus terminal in Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si, 2019; and (b) notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee even after arrival at the destination, he/she was on board the AJ taxi operated by the victim AI.