2. After an appeal is filed.

The reasoning for this part is as follows. Except for the addition of “No. 3-1, 2, and 1-1 of the evidence No. 5-1 of the judgment of the court of first instance” in the front of the evidence No. 7-1 of the judgment No. 5 of the court of first instance, this part of the judgment is identical to the entry of “1-3 facts recognized” among the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

“B. At the time of Hyundai Engineering Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the present”).

) The Samsung Engineering Co., Ltd. and Samsung Engineering Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as “Tsung”) are limited to

(2) The Defendant and Hyundai, Samsung Co., Ltd. jointly ordered camping construction (such as supply of electricity from the transformation station designated by the launch station to the staff accommodation) necessary for three employees accommodation of each company, and the citizen energy recommended by the Defendant was selected as a successful bidder. Accordingly, the Defendant, Hyundai, and Samsung Co., Ltd., the construction cost of construction between the national energy and the national energy, at USD 1,140,000, was at KRW 1,140 (hereinafter “instant construction”).

(B) the contract agreement (hereinafter referred to as “instant contract”).

The conclusion of the contract was entered into on March 4, 2013, and on May 22, 2013, 380,000 dollars (i.e., USD 1140,00) and each contract amount as of May 22, 2013 (i.e., USD 1140,00 ¡À3). However, there was no separate contract form with the Defendant. The national energy was “B” regardless of whether it was before or after the mutual change.

Between B and B, the construction period for the instant construction works was from February 26, 2013 to June 20, 2013, and the construction price was determined as USD 816,000, and the subcontract was concluded.

B thereafter, April 24, 2013.