국가유공자등록거부처분취소
1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;
2. The Defendant’s decision on May 6, 2010 that constitutes a person of distinguished service to the State.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff entered on November 13, 2007 and discharged from military service on October 10, 2009.
B. The Plaintiff asserted that he was suffering from military service and applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the Defendant with respect to the state and symptoms after the operation (hereinafter “the instant wounds”) under the influence of “consceptic sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sponsive sp
On May 6, 2010, the Defendant rendered a disposition rejecting the above application (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the causal relationship between the above difference and the performance of official duties is not recognized.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 10, 12, and 13, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion did not have any special kneee in the Plaintiff before entering the instant case. However, the instant disposition based on the premise that there was no proximate causal relation between the instant difference and the performance of official duties is unlawful, since the Plaintiff’s assertion was based on the fact that knee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee se
B. Determination 1) Legal doctrine includes diseases in the line of duty during education, training, or performance of duty under Article 4(1)6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State.
The term "military personnel or police officers" means those who are injured or ill during education and training or in the performance of their duties.
Therefore, in order to be the difference between the above provisions, there should be a proximate causal relationship between the education and training or the performance of duties and the injury or disease, and the causal relationship between the duty, etc. and the injury or disease should be proved by the party asserting it.
However, the causal relationship is.