A. At around 18:00 on November 20, 209, the fact of recognition that Defendant B driven a road on the Rash Apartment-dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, by driving a car for the automobile of this case (hereinafter “the automobile of this case”) on the right side from 103 km to 103 km on the right side. The Plaintiff was driving a vehicle of this case after CTpllerS 100ccoba (hereinafter “the vehicle of this case”) and driven the vehicle of this case while driving the vehicle of this case on the left side of the vehicle of this case, while driving the vehicle of this case on the right side of the vehicle of this case, the vehicle of this case was in excess of the central line for overtaking the vehicle of this case and driving the vehicle of this case into the underground parking lot of this case, and caused the collision between the front part of the vehicle of this case and the left side of the vehicle of this case, and the plaintiff suffered injury to the vehicle of this case and the vehicle of this case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 13, 18, 19, Eul evidence 4-2, 3, Eul evidence 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13, and the result of the appraisal by this court for FE fire-specific motor vehicle damage adjusting companies;

B. Determination 1) In a case where Defendant B’s prior vehicle liable for damage makes a left-hand turn, it cannot be said that the driver has a duty of care to pay attention to the movement of the vehicle following the vehicle expected to overtake the vehicle to the left side beyond the center line of the yellow-ray (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 96Do2624, Dec. 23, 1996). However, in a case where the driver of any motor vehicle makes a left-hand turn, the driver of any motor vehicle shall operate the direction direction, etc. from the time when the vehicle reaches the place where the right-hand turn is to turn to the left at least 30 meters before the left-hand turn is reached until the left-hand turn is completed (Article 38 of the Road