beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.07.01 2014나6339

구상금

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with the insured for the Fitscar car (hereinafter “instant car”) (hereinafter “instant car”) from January 3, 2009 to September 24, 2009, with respect to the Fitscar (hereinafter “instant car”).

B. C was aware of the fact that he had obtained E’s driver’s license prior to D, but it was impossible for D to use the pertinent car as a minor, and that D (H students, 18 years old and older than 18 months old and older than 1981) offered a driver’s license on February 15, 2009 and delivered the instant car to C after he leased the instant car.

C. On February 15, 2009, C with a driver’s license departed from the Defendant, G, and I to the instant car of this case, and the Defendant, without a driver’s license, wanting to make a driver’s license to C in the front trial, and C transferred a driver’s license to the Defendant.

At around 19:00 on February 15, 2009, the Defendant, while driving the instant car, shocked the centralized separation zone from the point at which 100.93 km in Western Coastal Expressway is located along the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the care of the public.

(hereinafter “instant accident”) e.

Due to the instant accident, G suffered bodily injury, such as 12 plehynasium and 1st century pressure frame, which require approximately 10 weeks medical treatment.

F. From March 12, 2009 to September 30, 2009, the Plaintiff paid KRW 28,383,260 (amounting to KRW 20% by negligence) to G as the insurer of the instant car. On April 29, 2009, the Defendant repaid KRW 2,00,000 to the Plaintiff.

G. Defendant, D, and C are mutually-friendly, and all minors were minors at the time of the instant accident.

[Reasons for Recognition] There is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7.