난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the following addition to the text of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, it shall be cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
On the 3rd page of the first instance judgment, the following is added to “not” (the Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff may be deemed a refugee who is a member of a specific social group in that it reflects the diverse and changing nature of groups existing in various society in determining the status as a member of a specific social group, or that the subject of gambling is not limited to State agencies. However, the mere fact that there is a dispute arising from a difference between families does not necessarily lead to the existence of gambling based on the status as a member of a specific social group).
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.