2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff served between around 1985 and June 30, 2004 as stone and rock.

B. On August 5, 2014, the Plaintiff was subject to the Rano cans test, the Radon test, and the physical strength test at the Central University Hospital (hereinafter “the instant injury”). On both sides, the Plaintiff was subject to the Radon No-Madon Radon (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

C. The Plaintiff applied for medical care to the Defendant regarding the instant injury and disease, but the Defendant was not admitted on the ground that it is medically difficult to recognize the injury and disease on March 19, 2015.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.

The plaintiff filed a request for review to the defendant on August 2015, but was dismissed on December 3, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6, 7, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 4, 5 and 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had been exposed to severe vibrations during the process of cutting the use of vibration tools, such as cryptites, while working for stone companies for about 25 years, and shots. The Plaintiff was diagnosed as the instant injury and disease through close inspection. Thus, the instant injury and disease constituted occupational disease.

나. 판단 앞서든 증거 및 이 법원의 한림대학교 성심병원장에 대한 신체감정촉탁결과에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하여 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 레이노 증후군은 임상적으로 신체 말초조직에 전형적인 색조변화를 수반하고, 이러한 색조변화가 없다면 객관적으로 레이노드 증후군으로 진단하지 않는 점, ② 원고의 의무기록에는 레이노 증후군의 가장 큰 특징인 색조변화(하얗게 또는 파랗게)에 대하여 의사가 이를 관찰하여 확인하였다는 내용을 발견할 수 없는 점, ③...