2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. On August 24, 2011, around 21:40, the Plaintiff: (a) went from the alleyway in front of the “Dju shop” located in the Jeonbuk-gun, the Plaintiff: (b) caused damage to the head of an unidentified in detail that requires treatment for about two weeks; and (c) caused injury to the scam and tensions of the scambin.

(hereinafter “The instant injury”) was convicted of a fine of KRW 700,000 on November 11, 201 of the facts constituting an offense, and upon receiving a summary order of KRW 1 million from the Southern District Court Branch of the Jeonju District Court (hereinafter “Seoul District Court”) to a fine of KRW 201 high-level 875,000,000, the Jeonju District Court filed an application for formal trial under the order of KRW 201 high-level 123. On June 5, 2012.

On November 21, 2012, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment on the ground that the Plaintiff was concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and sentenced the Plaintiff to a judgment of conviction of KRW 700,000,000 against the said judgment. The said judgment became final and conclusive around that time (hereinafter “instant criminal judgment”).

B. On the other hand, on June 22, 2012, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff on June 22, 2012 against the Jeonju District Court Decision 2012Gau541, Namwon-gun, Seoul District Court, which rendered a judgment on December 28, 2012 that “the Plaintiff shall pay KRW 1.4 million to the Defendant and its delay damages,” and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant civil judgment”) C.

On January 17, 2013, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,513,150 to the Defendant as damages according to the instant civil judgment.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 and 2 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion did not harm the defendant of this case.

Nevertheless, the defendant filed a complaint with the investigative agency several times from the plaintiff with a false statement, and submitted it.