2. The judgment below's punishment is reasonable in light of the following facts: (a) it is acknowledged that a public official exercises an unreasonable pressure by using a position called "C", and furthermore, the quality of the offense committed by a public official is poor; (b) it is found that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the defendant; (c) there is no criminal record exceeding the fine against the defendant; (d) the damaged public official does not want the punishment of the defendant; and (e) the damaged public official does not want the punishment of the defendant; and (e) other matters concerning the age, character, environment, career, circumstances after the crime was committed; and (e) the

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.