도로법위반
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
1. A’s violation of restriction on operation at a place of business where it is difficult to operate the expressway remaining on March 17, 1996, which is an employee of the specific accused of the facts charged; and
2. The penal law applicable to a summary order subject to review has retroactively lost its effect in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality (Supreme Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (Joint) Decided October 28, 2010). As such, the Defendant was acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act and the summary of this decision is publicly notified pursuant to Article 58(2) of the Criminal Act.