However, for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive against the Defendants.

Defendant

A, on August 14, 2018, appealed at the Ulsan District Court sentenced one year to imprisonment for fraud, etc. and two years of suspension of execution, but the said judgment became final and conclusive after withdrawing an appeal on October 16, 2018. On July 13, 2018, the Daegu District Court sentenced the Defendant to six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury). On September 21, 2018, the Daegu District Court sentenced the Defendant to four months of imprisonment for the said case. On November 23, 2018, the appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court and became final and conclusive on the same day.

Defendant

B On August 14, 2018, the Ulsan District Court sentenced 6 months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. and 2 years of suspended execution, which became final and conclusive on August 22, 2018.

A person who received money from an unspecified number of victims in the name of "C" (hereinafter referred to as "C") as if he/she would give a loan to an unspecified number of victims and takes over money from another person's account secured in advance (hereinafter referred to as "c") and takes charge of operating a c's c's c's c's c's c's c' c' c' c' c' c' c' c' c' c' and the Defendants play the role of delivering money acquired by means of electronic financial transactions or withdrawing

On January 2018, the Defendants accepted the proposal from C, stating, “Around January 2018, the Defendants sent the passbook or card to a place where they instruct or withdraw it in cash and deposit it into an account which they inform the victims of the payment, and then, accepted it up to KRW 10 million in each month.” The “Scaming” officers in the name of “Scaming” take over the necessary accounts and cash cards and passwords connected thereto from the account holders of a large number of large number of large-scale public accounts, and deliver them to the Defendants. On the other hand, they commit the so-called “loan Fraud” crime by deceiving the victims of money by misrepresenting the employees of financial institutions to make additional loans under the pretext of the repayment of existing loans.