A. In light of the fact that the defense counsel (unfairness) accused against the defendant and the victim did not want the defendant's punishment, the sentence of the court below that sentenced the community service order for one year and six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution and 200 hours of imprisonment is too unreasonable.

B. In light of the fact that each of the instant crimes committed by the prosecutor (unfairly unfair) is based on the fact that the Defendant is in the position of director of the GNF and the nature of the crime is inferior, and that the amount of fraud by the Defendant is considerable, the punishment sentenced by the lower court is too uneasible.

2. Although it is recognized that the amount obtained by the defendant was not a total of KRW 700 million, the defendant is deemed to have a little amount of money, on the other hand, that the defendant reflects his mistake, has no record of criminal punishment, has recovered damage to the victim, and the victim does not want the punishment. In light of the motive and circumstances of each of the crimes of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are conditions for sentencing, such as the character and conduct and environment of the defendant, which are conditions for sentencing, such as the records and arguments of this case, the punishment imposed by the court below against the defendant is deemed appropriate, and it is not determined that the above grounds for appeal are unfair because it is too

3. The appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.