When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one shall lend any access medium while receiving, demanding, or promising to receive compensation in using or managing the access medium.

Nevertheless, on December 5, 2017, the Defendant promised to receive 10% of the deposit amount from a person in the name in the name in the name in the middle of the 692 in order to use the account to money laundering of casino funds from the person in the name in the front of the 2017 Suwon-si, the Defendant, as a fee, to receive 10% of the deposit amount from the person in the name in the name in the front of the 692, and to deliver one check card connected to the bank account (B) of the name in the name of the Defendant to the person in the name in

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to pay the price, and lent the approaching media.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to data on search and seizure warrants;

1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Based on the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentence is determined as ordered.

The favorable circumstances: The crime of this case is not only detrimental to the trust in electronic financial transactions, but also is a criminal act that can cause damage to a large number of victims by using the leased access media in a criminal act such as telecommunications financial fraud, etc., and the actual fact that the access media of the Defendant lent was abused in the criminal act, thereby causing damage.