A. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination Domination, and the fact that the Defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case is favorable to the Defendant, but the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case, even though it is a repeated crime due to the same kind of crime, etc., is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

In addition, there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment, and considering all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unfluent so that it cannot be deemed unfair. Thus, the above assertion by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.