소유권이전등기등
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The premise of dispute
A. On October 28, 1981, the Plaintiff married with F on October 28, 1981, and lived with H and L as his child on January 3, 1992.
After that, on March 20, 192, the plaintiff remarriedd with M on March 20, 1992 and lived with N under the N, but died in around 1997, the plaintiff was divorced on June 2002.
In addition, the plaintiff reported a marriage with P on February 25, 2003, but on April 30, 2004, the mediation was concluded to divorce between them, and the divorce was reported on May 20, 2004, and thereafter, on May 28, 2004, the plaintiff reported a re-Marriage with F on May 28, 2004, but again agreed on November 24, 2005.
B. On December 30, 2003, F sold the real estate No. 1 of this case owned by the Plaintiff to Defendant B in KRW 150,000,000, and F completed the registration of ownership transfer concerning the real estate No. 1 of this case.
C. On December 30, 2003, F entered into a sales contract with Defendant D (the actual buyer is Q, the husband of Defendant D) to sell KRW 247,00,00 to Defendant D real estate in the instant case. Defendant D succeeded to the Plaintiff’s obligation to refund the lease deposit and instead paid KRW 192,00,000 out of the remainder, in lieu of the Plaintiff’s obligation to refund the lease deposit, and the remainder of KRW 55,000,000 out of the remainder, and F completed the ownership transfer registration (the ownership transfer registration in the name of the Defendants with respect to each of the instant real estate was referred to as “the ownership transfer registration in the instant case”). The F completed the ownership transfer registration in the name of the Defendants with respect to each of the instant real estate.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2-1 to 4, Eul evidence 3-1 to 3, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 13, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. Although the Plaintiff did not sell each of the instant real estate to the Defendants, F, in collusion with Defendant B, stolen the Plaintiff’s seal imprint at the Plaintiff’s home, and forged various documents necessary for the registration of transfer of ownership with the issuance of a certificate of seal imprint on behalf of the Plaintiff, and the registration of transfer of ownership in this case