On April 16, 2014, the Defendant stated that “Around the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon District Court Decision 2017 J. 3226, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D that “The annual profit would accrue if he/she makes an investment in the inside of the inside of the Gu, 14-15%, 7% of the profits would be paid if he/she lends money to the victim, and 10 million won would be lent.”

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he was able to use it for the Defendant’s personal debt repayment, etc., and even if he borrowed money from the injured party with the amount of 20 million won at the time, 7% profits, or there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money.

The Defendant received KRW 9.5 million from the victim’s bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day, and received KRW 500,000 from the victim to August 5, 2016, in total, KRW 37,000,000 from two victims over six occasions, as indicated in the list of crimes in attached Table 1, as well as from August 5, 2016.

After all, the defendant had received property by deceiving the victims.

On August 12, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant called the victim E, who was a student after the university of the Defendant, to be a student E, who was a student of the Defendant’s college, to pay KRW 5,500,000,000,000,000,000,000 won for a loan of the terms and conditions as collateral for the insurance purchased through NNB to pay KRW 5,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he did not make such investment as above, and did not have the intent or ability to change it to the injured party by reaching the debt amount of 30 million won at the time.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received money from the victim to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant at around 10:30 on the same day.