A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2.5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.00,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Defendant

A is a person who operates a general restaurant in the name of “E” in Gyeonggi-si, Osan-si, and Defendant B is an employee of the above restaurant.

1. Defendant A

A. Even when a general restaurant is prohibited from selling alcoholic beverages, the Defendant, while operating the said restaurant from March 3, 2014 to April 27, 2014, violated matters to be observed by an ordinary restaurant operator by selling only alcoholic beverages, such as beer and beer, along with alcoholic beverages, such as beer and beer, without selling them.

B. On April 27, 2014, from around 21:00 to 24:00 of the same day, the Defendant violated the code of practice of an ordinary restaurant business operator by allowing the instant restaurant restaurant customer F (the age of 43) to combined B, who is an employee, to drink with drinking together and drink with other entertainment business operators.

2. Defendant B, as an employee at the same date, time, and place as the above “B”, was engaged in entertainment activities for profit-making purposes such as drinking drinking together with the F customer jobs in order to raise a large number of boxes of business places.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the prosecution against F and the Defendants;

1. On-site photographs (the type of business of Defendant A’s police statements written on the police statements) are written on how to conduct the business, such as beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, beer, tamper, tamper, tamper, etc. At the entrance of the Defendant. The structure of the business establishment, which is tampered by the tamper at the entrance, the structure of the business establishment, and most alcoholic beverages and alcoholic beverages are written on the mer new-line alcoholic beverage and alcoholic beverage (including alcoholic beverages '

) Some of alcoholic beverages appear to be food boomed, dubed, bed, and air booming. This is difficult to deem that the Defendant mainly prepared and sold food, but also sold alcoholic beverages together with meals. According to the foregoing, the Defendant appears to have sold alcoholic beverages only, and thus, the facts constituting the crime of Paragraph 1(a) of the holding is found guilty. The application of the law to this case is to apply.

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;