When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 11, 2018, at around 01:00, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports from the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul, “Aer C, E, a police officer affiliated with the Seoul Mapo-gu Police Station D District Hospital, who called the Defendant to return home, thereby interfering with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reported case at 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (topline telephone investigation);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: Reasons for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act [unfair circumstances] The degree of assault against a police officer on duty in the course of performing official duty is not less and less than that of the punishment [for favorable circumstances], there is no record of punishment other than twice the punishment, and the serious reflect; and