If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Around 01:00 on March 24, 2017, the Defendant heard that the Defendant returned to her country from C, the background leading up to the Incheon Western Police Station B, the police station of Seo-gu, Incheon, which was called to help the Defendant return home, from 112, on the part of the 329-h, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, 839, the Doz. 705 of the apartment complex of this 705, the Defendant:

Maternity in the Republic of Korea is changed.

I would like to say, this flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick, and flick flick flick.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Based on the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable condition: The defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake.

D is not punishable by the defendant.

The defendant is an initial offender who has no record of punishment.

Unfavorable circumstances: It is necessary to severely punish police officers in order to enhance their trust in national public authority with respect to their acts of obstructing the performance of public duties.