물품대금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.
After 17,00 won after 17,150,50 won, 126.5 won, 17,500 won, 17,500 won, 93.5 won, 17,589,500 won, 126.5 won, 126.5 won, 2,150,500 won, 93.5 won, 17,589,500 won, 17,500 won, 126.5 won, 126.5 won, 17,500 won, 126.5 won, 17,500 won, 17,500 won, 93.5 won, 1,589,500 won, and 102,11,200, 2000 won, 203, 201, 13, 201, 17, 2000 won and 13 of the value-added (hereinafter referred to the Plaintiff”).
On November 26, 2013, the Plaintiff was provided with the file of this case from the Defendant and produced 500,000 won of the sampling level 1,500. On November 26, 2013, the Plaintiff confirmed the error on the said file provided by the Defendant, and re-produced the sampling level using the files newly provided by the Plaintiff.
On December 6, 2013, the Defendant paid KRW 3 million to the Plaintiff out of the instant labelling price, and promised to pay the remainder to the Plaintiff on December 12, 2013, and received the instant labelling from the Plaintiff.
[Based on the facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 6, 11 through 14, Eul evidence Nos. 10, Eul evidence Nos. 10, and the purport of the whole pleadings, barring any special circumstance, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the plaintiff the total amount of KRW 8.22 million and the damages for delay due to the production of sampling labels.
The defendant's assertion as to the defendant's assertion was confirmed to be defective in 5,220 of the labelling of the instant labelling that the plaintiff produced and supplied, 3,324 of the labelling of Mablves, 1,500 of the front labelling of Mablves, Mablves of Mablves, Mablves of Mablves of Mablves of Mablves of Mablves of Mablves of Mablves of Mablves of Mablves of Mablves of Mablves of Mablves, 15,