When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) attached Da high schools located in regular Eup/Myeon-si C, and (b) attached strawet to the strings installed in a car truck; (c) attached strings to the strings to connect the victim E (49) with any fruit connected to the upper end of the tree and the strings by manipulating the strings on the strings; and (d) attached the strings to the strings; and (e) attached the strings to the strings.

In such a case, as a clerist, he did not put any person other than cargo on the cleret attached to the cler as above, and he had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as checking whether the cler was a normal state with which he can withstanding the load under the cler’s Schedule before work, and failing to conduct any work exceeding it after being aware of the load permitted under the cler’s Schedule.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to perform such duty of care as above and caused the victim to board the booms, neglected to check whether the state of the booms is a normal state with which the booms can withstanding down under the booms of the Won, and proceed with the work beyond the load permitted under the booms of the Won. As a result, the victim who boomed booms installed in the above booms and boomed on the booms, and led the victim to fall down on the ground floor far.

As a result, the defendant caused the victim to suffer the necessary water and other damages for six months of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (whether it is possible to install a kack creamet);

1. Article 268 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 268 of the Selection of Punishment Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the case where the defendant violated his duty of care on safety at the work site, and this is the case.