업무상횡령등
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
The judgment below
Examining the evidence duly admitted by the court of first instance, which maintained the reasoning of the court below, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of the charge of bribery to a third party among the charged facts of this case and of occupational embezzlement on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on job relationship or consideration in the crime
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.