Since there is a road bended by the center line, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle. In such a case, even though the Defendant neglected to operate the car audio equipment and did not properly look at the center line, the Defendant caused the front part of the victim E ( South, 46 years old)'s car driving, which was proceeding from the left side of the said vehicle to the "Yananananee Eup" page, with the front part of the said vehicle's "Yananane Eup", and thereby caused the victim E to suffer the victim E, who needs approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. The facts charged of the instant case are premised on the premise that the Defendant committed a traffic accident by breaking the fruit of the central line, and the question of whether the instant traffic accident occurred due to the Defendant’s invasion. The main evidence corresponding to this point lies in the victim E’s statement made by the police and the prosecutor and the North Korean branch of the Road Traffic Authority prior to the Road Traffic Authority, and the remaining evidence submitted by the prosecutor are the road status after the occurrence of the accident, the vehicle of the accident, and the photographs on the dead load due to the accident.

First of all, considering the statements of the victim E, the defendant and the victim E asserted that the traffic accident of this case occurred due to the other party's central crime in the course of investigation conducted by the police and the prosecutor's office. Thus, the defendant and the victim E are negligent by the defendant's statements of the victim E alone.

It is difficult to conclude it.

Next, the results of the comprehensive analysis of traffic accidents by the North Korean branch of the Road Traffic Authority.