On April 22, 2017, around 22:40, the Defendant requested the police officer to report the bridge to the police officer, and requested the police officer to dispatch the bridge to the police officer, and requested the police officer belonging to the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station Down-gu Police Station, Seoul, which was dispatched to the site after receiving a 112 report, to dispatch the patrol vehicle to the police officer E and the police officer belonging to the same police officer, without any specific reason, but the patrol vehicle cannot be used for private use. As the Defendant refused to use the public transportation to the effect that he/she would use the public transportation, he/she would not use the patrol vehicle for private use.

The racker may die at one time.

In performing the bath theory, “A” et al., assaulted “A” et al. to the above E, wherein he/she sawd both drinkings to the above E several times and took the scam to the face of the above E.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order, such as the protection of the lives of the people of police officers and the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. On-site business trips 112, the Defendant asserts that he reported a business trip [the Defendant only was a police officer E’s speech that disregards himself and took a bath to the police officer, and was faced with the floor, leading him to the floor, and that he did not put him on the face of the police officer.

However, according to the consistent statement of F by a witness witness witness witness E and E who had been present at the scene of the instant case, it is sufficiently recognized that the Defendant committed an assault to E by a police officer as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment of the court).

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the reasons for sentencing of sentence of imprisonment with prison labor, and the reasons therefor;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment] shall interfere with the performance of official duties, and the basic area (six months to one year and six months) of the basic area (the interference with the performance of official duties and the coercion of official duties) (the person who is subject to special sentencing) shall be no one.