명예훼손
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, from May 2016 to March 2017, worked as an employee in the Daegu Suwon-gu D located and operated by the victim C, and is superior to the relationship between the president of philosophical hall and the victim.
The same shall apply to the case where the victim has good president of philosophical center.
Therefore, the relationship between the president of the philosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolosolo
The husband of the victim has been s winded and the father has been written.
When the husband suffered a short half of the female employees, the husband has changed it, and the husband is good to G.
The victim frequently attends the mental department and flocks.
By stating to the purport that “the victim was a victim, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts.”
2. Determination
(a) Punishment Acts: Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act;
(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act;
(c) Members not subject to punishment after filing a public prosecution: A written agreement on April 11, 2018;
(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;