성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal against the defendants (one year of imprisonment, one year of confiscation, one year of suspended sentence in six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. Defendant A’s murder case, Defendant A’s confession, the fact that the Defendant was against the Defendant while committing a crime, the fact that the gains acquired by committing a crime seems not to have been high, the fact that the health condition is not good is a favorable sentencing ground, and the crime is not good, such as aiding and abetting a criminal to conceal the fact that he is a unemployment of a sexual traffic business establishment, and the fact that he/she committed two times the same criminal records and, in particular, committed the crime during the period of suspended execution due to the same crime, is a disadvantageous
In full view of the above sentencing factors, in full view of the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to the commission of the crime, and all other matters on the sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments of this case, the judgment of the court below is deemed appropriate, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.
B. Defendant B Dop, Defendant B’s confession, Defendant’s confession, and Defendant’s confession, and Defendant’s absence of criminal records or fines beyond the same kind of criminal records or fines are favorable grounds for sentencing. The fact that Defendant B’s crime also interferes with the appropriate criminal judicial action of the State and makes it difficult to find substantial truth is an unfavorable reason for sentencing.
In full view of the above sentencing factors, in full view of the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to the commission of the crime, and all other matters on the sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments of this case, the judgment of the court below is deemed appropriate, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.