2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is against the confession of the crime, the profits acquired by the crime of this case are merely KRW 50,00,000, the defendant is the first offender, the defendant's health status is not good, and the economic situation is difficult.

However, taking into account the reality that the so-called large passbook is both shared by transferring and lending the means of electronic financial transactions, such as the instant crime, and such large passbook is abused for various crimes, the Defendant’s liability is not less than that of the crime. In fact, the electronic financial transaction leased by the Defendant was used for the crime, and the Defendant was also deemed to have been sufficiently predicted that the means of access provided could be used for the crime because the means of access was leased in return for payment, and the Defendant could have sufficiently predicted that the means of access provided could be used for the crime. In full view of various circumstances such as the Defendant’s character, character, environment, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc.,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.