However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant and C had the victim D by inducing the victim to gambling and by deceiving the victim to take money through deception, and C had the role of " butterts" in a single name to lend money in the gambling place, and he had the victim employed E, F, G, H, and I with the condition that he would receive daily allowances from C, and he had the victim expressed his intent to gambling in a way that he would inform the victim of the plaque through a water signal.

After that, on November 201, 201, the Defendant called “a long time, brued, or any other defect,” called to the Defendant’s phone call to the Defendant, and went to the Defendant’s real estate office operated by the KJ on November 2, 201, and subsequently, introduced the victim with C, G, I, and E at that place, and then, the Defendant, G, I, and E, from around 18:00 on November 2, 201 to 21:00 on the same day, made a decision on the winning game in the order of putting 10,00 won per each person’s card in advance, after receiving four copies of each card from the said M’s office with the victim, using Chapter 52 on the same day, from around 18:00 on the same day to 21:00 on the same day.

At this time, C prepared the above gambling place and lent money prepared in advance at the gambling place to the victim, and Defendant, G, I, and E received money from C in advance and sent water signals to each other while gambling with the victim.

In addition, in a way that a spath is bad, dead, and a spath is added to money and a 5 million won is stolen from the injured party by using a game. From November 2, 2011 to November 30, 201, a 13 times in total, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, the 13 times in which a spath has been stolen, and the spath has been delivered from the injured party, and the spath has been stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigative report (abusing a copy of the judgment of public prosecution C and evidence records);

1. Copy of protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the police; and

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of investigation report;

1. Criminal facts;