A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering the fact that the crime of this case is not good, and that the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime resulting from the same crime even though he had several criminal records of the same kind, strict punishment against the defendant is needed.

However, considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is divided in depth; (b) the actual benefits from the instant larceny and the fraud overlap; (c) the recovery of damage was partially made; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct and environment; (b) motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (c) the conditions of sentencing specified in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate; and (d) the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s above assertion are deemed unreasonable because it is too heavy or too harsh.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.