On July 20, 2017, the Defendant was a public official working for the Local Labor Agency B, and around 15:00 on July 20, 2017, at the Office C Office of the Gwangju Mine Police Station, the Defendant was investigated with the victim D who filed a false public document with the victim D who filed a false public document, and the Victim D submitted a false public document to the investigator with the official seal of the prosecutor.

The statement "," and the victim D continues to be "the public document is attached to the court protocol and the protocol of examination of the witness, etc. of the Defendants concerned, and 100% evidence."

I have the honor to present documentary evidence.

The victim threatened the victim by taking the same action to inflict any danger and injury on the victim, such as committing a defect in the statement as “I am well discarded,” and “I am well discarded.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. E’s statement. The Defendant’s words “I am well discarded,” “I am well discarded,” means that the Defendant’s words have a threat of harm sufficient to cause fears to the victim (other than the Defendant, “I am well discarded to the person who makes a speech without any doubt.”

“The victim refers to “I,” and the victim “I,”

In other words, “the victim must see the victim’s letter.”

Then, even if the defendant's assertion was made, the above words also constitute a threat of harm sufficient to cause fears to the victim (the same shall apply to the threat of harm that is sufficient to cause fears to the victim), and also, that he did not have an intention to actually harm the victim's body.

Even if there was a perception or acknowledgement about the threat of such harm and injury.

It is reasonable to see that at the time, the atmosphere of the process of the substitutional investigation (the police officer E in charge of the substitutional investigation was a peaceful attitude in the atmosphere of the investigation due to the situation in which the victim's statement is heard at the time, and each other's speech.