Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The Defendant, at around 14:50 on August 5, 2017, was parked on the “D cafeteria” road operated by the Victim C in Gumi-si B, Si, 2017, with the victim as a parking problem. While the Defendant and the surrounding merchants and players observe it, the Defendant was not in compliance with the victim’s “hacks, singe, singe, and singe, singe, singe, and singe the victim.”

D. The victim openly insultingd the victim by referring to the pulse that “brupt ...” in a large sense.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The written statement made by the prosecution against C ( although the defendant was assaulted by the injured party and was able to hear his desire to commit the instant crime, it is difficult to view such an act by the defendant as constituting an act that does not violate social norms in light of the content of the bath theory written in the judgment).

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;