성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (the imprisonment for six months, the suspension of execution for two years, the order to attend sexual assault therapy for forty hours, the order to provide community service for 80 hours, the confiscation) is too uneased and unreasonable.
2. The court below's reasoning for sentencing takes into account the sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence. The defendant reflects depth with the recognition of the crime of this case, the defendant has no criminal power, and there is no change in the sentencing conditions in the trial compared with the judgment of the court below. Thus, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.