beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.02.13 2015노11

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The sentence of the lower court against the accused (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable circumstance such as the defendant's confession of the crime of this case and the defendant's confession, the circumstance that the defendant's driving without a drinking or without a license may be considered, the defendant again sold a vehicle while not driving a drinking or without a license, the traffic accident caused by driving without a license does not seem to have occurred, etc. When the judgment becomes final and conclusive on November 1, 2014, the principle of equity with the case of first head's violation of the Road Traffic Act at the time the judgment becomes final and conclusive, the defendant is the most responsible for supporting his and her wife and four children. However, the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed while driving a vehicle without drinking, despite the cancellation of a driver's license due to drinking or driving without drinking, and it is difficult for the defendant to obtain a driver's license of this case at the time of the crime of this case, and it is considerably difficult for the defendant to obtain a driver's license of drinking or drinking without drinking, etc. at the time of the crime of this case.

참조조문