A. The Plaintiff A’s KRW 5,00,000 and for this, 5% per annum from September 1, 2017 to March 10, 2021; and

A. The plaintiff A is the mother of the plaintiff B as the disabled in the third degree of intellectual disability, and the plaintiff B is the disabled in the second degree of intellectual disability.

The plaintiffs are neighboring land that they first become aware of with the defendant around April 2014 or around February 2015.

B. The Defendant, as indicated in the attached list, was prosecuted for violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the “Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes”) that he/she had sexual intercourses over several occasions from around July 2017 to August 2017, and was sentenced to eight years of imprisonment for all the charges on July 11, 2019 (Seoul District Court Branch Branch Decision 2018 Gohap 272), and was sentenced to eight years of imprisonment (hereinafter referred to as the “Seoul District Court Branch Branch Decision 2018 Gohap 272). The Defendant appealed the judgment of the lower court on February 20, 2020 and convicted the Plaintiff of the criminal facts under the Defendant against the Plaintiff, but with respect to the remainder of the facts charged, it was proven without reasonable doubt that the Defendant, knowing that he/she had a mental disability to the Plaintiff A by force.

It can not be seen that the fact of additional sexual intercourse with the Plaintiff B, other than the criminal facts found guilty as follows, was proven without reasonable doubt.

The lower court sentenced the Defendant to five years of imprisonment with prison labor on the grounds that the Defendant cannot be seen as having been acquitted (Seoul High Court Decision 2019No. 383). Although the Defendant and the prosecutor were on the appeal judgment, the appeal was dismissed on May 14, 2020 (Supreme Court Decision 2020Do3490).

The defendant is a person with disabilities of grade 2 with intellectual disability, who first becomes aware of around February 2015 between the defendant (math, 45 years of age), the victim B (math, 25 years of age) who is a father of A, and the victim of grade 2 with a disability.

On July 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the Defendant’s house located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, that he/she would drink A and alcohol with the victim as his/her house; and (b) he/she would not refuse to do so.

the victim may be entitled to the victim’s ‘Admoni’?

B. Does it fall short of,

It is so great that it can be said that it is.