2. The act of transferring an access medium, such as the instant crime, is an act that facilitates various criminal acts, such as a single scaming, and there is a need to strictly punish and eradicate it. The access medium transferred by the Defendant was actually used for the criminal act of scaming, and the Defendant had a record of being suspended from indictment for the same crime, etc., which is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant is the first offender, and the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake is favorable to the defendant.

In addition, there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be newly considered after the pronouncement of the lower judgment, and considering the following: (a) the number of accessible media that the Defendant transferred by the Defendant; (b) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime; and (c) all of the sentencing conditions stated in the records and arguments of the instant case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.