A. Facts of recognition 1) Real estate lessor C, loan hub D, etc.: (a) concluded a loan agreement with a new cooperative or credit cooperative, etc. where the examination of loan documents is relatively difficult, or (b) made a false loan contract, and (c) illegally divided the loan. Accordingly, C purchased a house leased in the form of a lease on the condition that the lessor, lessee, etc. take over the obligation of the deposit money through Dong E; (b) D, F, and G contact with H who are the Plaintiff’s employees and take charge of the loan-related affairs; (c) I, J, and K, as the Plaintiff’s employees, prepare internal documents as if the loan-related application was made normally; (d) prepared a false loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related-related-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related-related-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related loan-related.

However, in fact, the above multi-household rental contract was made by falsity, and the defendant leased the above house.