However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 17, 2017, the Defendant entered into the E’s residence located in Heakdong-gu DBD 305 on Cheongju-si around 04:30, the Defendant discovered that the Victim C (25 years of age) was living together with E in a relationship with the Defendant, and found the Victim C (25 years of age), and divided the victim’s face into drinking and inflicted injury on the victim, such as luminous bones, flador, etc., requiring approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Complaint;

1. Deficial photo of an injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime, and Article 257 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 32(1)3 and Article 25(3)3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Litigation, etc. of Application for Compensation Order (the materials recorded in the records of this case alone are not sufficient to issue an order for compensation in criminal proceedings, such as where the amount of compensation for the defendant cannot be clearly calculated on the basis of the materials indicated in the records of this case). The reason for sentencing [the scope of the recommended punishment] There are no basic areas (from April to January 6) of the first type (the scope of the recommended punishment) [the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] of the basic area (from April to January 6] of the first type (the degree of special injury] [the degree of injury of the defendant] of the victim. There is no previous conviction against the defendant. The agreement with the victim is recognized as erroneous, and the sentence is determined as ordered by considering the sentencing conditions of Article 51 of the Criminal Act.