폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving CK7 cars.
On May 29, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car at around 15:27, and proceeded with the said car by the victim E who driven the Dsan Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa P a Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa P a Pa Pa P, a Pa Pa Pa P
The Defendant continued to drive the above K7 vehicle operated by the Defendant without any traffic interference on the ground that the victim E attempted a sudden change of the car, and stopped the vehicle at the above K7 vehicle, and let the victim E, who followed the Defendant, stop the vehicle at a rapid rate, and had the victim E, who followed the Defendant stop the vehicle at the above 49 years of age, and had the victim FF(49 years of age) driver, who followed the above vehicle at the rear end, got the back of the said vehicle at the front of the above 1st truck of the victim FF(F(49 years of age). At the same time, the victim F, who caused the above 1,213,375 won of the repair cost, such as the exchange of the above 1,213,375 won of the repair cost, such as the above 1,49,63,678 won of the repair cost, respectively, damaged the cargo vehicle to the extent that the repair cost, such as the 3,493,678 won of the vehicle.
Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and inflicted an injury on the victim FF, and each motor vehicle owned by the victims was damaged.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;
1. Each police statement to F and E;
1. A medical certificate;
1. Written estimate;
1. On-site photographs of traffic accidents;
1. The defendant and the defense counsel alleged to the effect that they did not have any intention to inflict any injury or damage to property on the defendant, while the investigation report (Evidence No. 5), internal investigation report (Evidence No. 5), and the defendant and the defense counsel did not have any intention to inflict any injury or damage to property.