If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is the 1806 Dong representative in South Yang-si.

On June 4, 2013, the Defendant, at around 19:00, damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by publicly pointing out the victim’s reputation in 2012, in order to escape from the unfavorable position that the Defendant solicited the head of the management office at the time of making a public announcement of bidding for the above apartment in 2012 at the place where the said representative is gathered.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, F, and G;

1. Application of each Act or subordinate statute entered in a written statement of the D/E, a fact confirmation certificate, a council of occupants' representatives (23 pages of investigation records), an application register for attending the council of occupants' representatives, and an investigation report (to listen to an I excursion ship statement of the H

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's argument regarding the defendant's assertion under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act only stated that "the head of the management office only stated that D's relative was trying to participate in a bid for luminous construction work," and that there was no means to say "the enterprise selected as a color construction work is the chairperson and the relative." However, considering the above evidence, such as D, E, F, and G's statements in the council of occupants' representatives at the time of the council of occupants' representatives, the defendant's statement as stated in the facts charged is recognized, and therefore, the above argument is groundless.