Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that all of the charges of this case (excluding non-crimes) against the Defendant on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In doing so, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the custodian’s status and intent to obtain unlawful acquisition in embezzlement, deception and deception in fraud, intent to commit fraud, and principle of court-oriented trial.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.