beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.09.08 2017고단1816

절도

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 30, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) at the Suwon Flag method Board, and completed the execution of the sentence on November 6, 2015.

On June 24, 2017, around 19:05, at the "D" store located in the second floor of the unit C building in Ansan-si, the Defendant laid down a head of 316,000 won of the market price owned by the victim E, and then laid down a head of 'F' store in the same floor and a head of 'F' store in the same floor and a head of 98,000 won of the market price owned by the victim G.

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the Chapter 3 of Blosts worth KRW 414,00 in the market price owned by the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E, H and I;

1. A previous conviction: Application of a reply to inquiry, report on investigation (report on confirmation of repeated offense) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense. Article 329 (Selection of Punishment of Imprisonment)

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the former part of the same Article, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the same Act (the defendant's previous conviction, etc. was committed on March 2017, and the crime of this case was committed again after having been sentenced to a fine on 13 occasions, but there are unfavorable circumstances, such as the victim's agreement, the damaged goods have been returned, the victim is raising a person of class 1 of intellectual disability, the defendant's wall is also the reason for the crime of this case and the defendant's treatment has been taken into account).