A and B shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

Defendant

A and B fail to pay the above fine, respectively.

[2014Modan348] Defendant A asserts that he lent KRW 70 million to G’s father H (Death June 24, 2010) and that the loan claim was transferred to Defendant C limited liability company operated by Defendant C.

A limited liability company I filed a lawsuit against G on July 19, 2010 against G for the claim for the amount of money transferred to the Gwangju District Court 2010Kadan12232. Defendant A testified after having been present at the Gwangju District Court 201Na5956 as a witness on February 15, 2011 and the Gwangju District Court 201Na5956 on December 9, 201.

1. On February 15, 2011, Defendant A’s perjury on February 15, 201, Defendant A’s Branch of the Gwangju District Court:

A. Although the Defendant did not lend KRW 40 million to the deceased H on January 16, 2010, the written indictment states that “the Defendant does not have any fact that the Defendant lent KRW 70 million to the deceased H,” the written indictment shall be amended ex officio to the extent that it does not affect the Defendant’s right of defense.”

Plaintiff

The Witness bears the testimony that “I have lent KRW 70 million to the deceased H” of the agent’s “I have to lend KRW 30 million on August 2009, KRW 40 million on January 16, 2010, KRW 70 million on a total,” and that “I have to lend KRW 70 million on January 16, 2010.”

B. On January 16, 2010, the deceased H testified the Plaintiff’s agent’s “not only” but also the deceased H testified to the witness to the effect that it is believed by borrowing KRW 40 million from the witness to believe that the Plaintiff’s agent borrowed the registration rights of KRW 40,000,00 to the witness, and the registration rights of the J and K also put the witness to the Maritime Affairs Council of South-Gun owned by the principal, and even in addition to this real estate, it was necessary to know whether other real estate is more likely to become more and more real estate in the south of the Republic of Korea.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. Defendant A’s perjury on December 9, 201, on December 201, 201, the Defendant was in the Gwangju District Court on December 9, 201, while the fact was in fact in the GH on January 9, 201.