beta
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2016.01.27 2015가합101978

청구이의

Text

1. The Defendant’s compulsory execution against the Plaintiffs based on the Seoul High Court Decision 2012Na47038 Decided May 21, 2013.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is the housing reconstruction and improvement project association established pursuant to the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) to remove 60 households and build new apartments, which were constructed on the land of the Ma, N,O, and P in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, the defendant union is the owner of each real estate listed in the separate sheet and his heir.

B. Some sectional owners of L Housing, for the purpose of establishing a reconstruction association under the Act on the Maintenance of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for the establishment of a reconstruction association. The reconstruction promotion committee opened an inaugural general meeting on March 28, 2004 and decided to establish an association with the consent of 56 persons among 60 sectional owners, and obtained the authorization of establishment of a reconstruction association from the vice-Mayor on May 19, 2004.

C. 1) The Defendant Union publicly announced the registration of trust on December 30, 2004 and publicly announced the reconstruction project implementation and the registration of trust on December 30, 2004, and during the period from January 17, 2005 to April 6, 2005, Plaintiff D, E, H, I, J, K, and Nonparty Q, R, etc. (hereinafter “Plaintiff D, etc.”).

(2) The application for parcelling-out was made only 43 households, excluding 13 households, such as R, I, J, K, and H, among 56 households of the members who agreed to re-building as a result of the application for parcelling-out, after obtaining authorization from the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office

Around June 2005, the Defendant Cooperative selected another general construction corporation as a Si Corporation, and notified it on May 30, 2006.

E. Plaintiff D. of the Defendant Union