When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 14:00 on May 8, 2013, at the public service center of the racing police station around 14:00, the Defendant: (b) left the house kitchen of D on May 8, 2013, the Defendant: (c) considered D, the complainant, twice, her head, her head, her head, her head, and (d) her head, and (e) Defendant E, her her head, her head, her head, her head, her head, and (e) her head her head her head her head her; (d) Defendant E, her head her head her head her her head her her head her her

'The complaint was prepared and submitted with the content of the complaint.

However, the fact is that D only shows two persons out of the fighting with the speech of A and E, and there is no assault against the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant filed a false complaint against D and brought a false complaint against D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement of D and E;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a notice of the result of disposition of a case under accusation, notice of the case under accusation, each written diagnosis, written decision (Dismissal of Application), written statement of a suspect, written diagnosis of an injury, copy of a written opinion, copy of each written statement, copy of each written statement, each written statement of statement (F, D, E), written statement of statement, copy of investigation report (Attachment of relevant case, written statement, etc.), copy of case transmission document, copy of investigation report of each written statement of suspect suspect (E, A, D), copy of each written protocol of suspect examination (written phone call with a reference witness G), copy of investigation report (written statement of reference witness H

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Code applicable to criminal facts and Article 156 of the choice of punishment for the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant suffered an injury by assault from D, and thus, the defendant was not guilty of D. However, in full view of each evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, all of the facts constituting the crime in the judgment is found guilty. Thus, the witness I's statement in the court was rejected, and as long as D directly testified and testified in this court, the above statement in the court shall be admissible in accordance with Article 316 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act.