A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. Defendant A

A. On May 10, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (e.g., refusal to measure the drinking level) (e., the Defendant was demanded four times in total to measure the drinking level in a manner of inserting alcohol in a manner of inserting alcohol into a drinking measuring instrument by inserting alcohol level of 0.087% under the influence of alcohol level 0.087%, while driving a vehicle in a cice haben-gu, the blood alcohol level of which was under the influence of alcohol level at around 16:30 on May 10, 2016.

Nevertheless, the Defendant avoided this and did not comply with the police officer’s request for a drinking test without any justifiable reason.

B. Around 17:00 on May 10, 2016, the Defendant insultd the D District, and the above D District.

For the reason that the Defendant’s refusal to take a drinking test is intended to take a photograph by the head F of the police station belonging to the D District, the victim, as stated in the foregoing paragraph, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by publicly insulting the victim at the ten police officers’ 10 places, stating that “Chewing rings, several rings, and rings that do not have any difficulty.”

C. The Defendant of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act is above B.

In time, at the same time, at a place, such as paragraph (1), spits spit on the floor of the said D District with the influence of alcohol, and spits it by following horses and actions such as "Chewing, smelting." to police officers.

2. Defendant B’s above Defendant A.

With the knowledge that A is under the influence of alcohol at the same time and place as the foregoing paragraph, A walked A with a vehicle driving in a vehicle with a vehicle driving in the CWhalog halog Gu car owned by the Defendant, and aided A's drinking driving by driving on the above vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. G 1. The statement;