However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. From August 3, 2014, the Defendant sent a message to the effect that, around September 16, 2014, at around September 3, 2014, the Defendant had a sense of view to the victim C (n, 42 years of age) who was working together as the team leader of the sales office located in the Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon Building as the team leader of the sales office, and had a sense of view to the victim C (n, 42 years of age) who was working for the same team, the Defendant threatened the victim as the head of the headquarters on September 3, 2014, on the ground that the victim was not in the mother of the head of the headquarters, and sent the message to the Defendant’s cell phone to the effect that “The victim would be well visible to the head of the headquarters, but will make it impossible for the victim to work any longer by demolishing the team leader.”

2. The Defendant’s intimidation and defamation on September 17, 2014, the Defendant, at around September 21, 2014, told the victim to the effect that he would be aware of the victim’s husband as if he were in a sonial relationship with the Defendant and others, and that he would be aware of the victim’s contact with the Defendant, and that he would be aware of the victim’s mobile phone when the victim refused to communicate with the Defendant, and that she would be her husband of the Party who would not have been aware of the fact. Furthermore, her husband would die with the fact that her husband would die. However, the victim would not die with her husband because she could not die with her husband, so she would threaten the victim’s husband, and continued to threaten D and unspecified number of traffic, who are charged with the conversation between the Defendant and the victim.” The Defendant told the victim to the effect that “I would she would see that I would go through the Defendant’s son and her drinking with the Defendant.”

However, the defendant did not have any such remarks from the victims.

Nevertheless, the defendant is suffering from the children of the victim, and the victim is also with another male.